ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occasionally develop respiratory failure and coagulopathy. We aimed to determine whether coagulation abnormalities at admission and during the course of hospitalization can predict the liberation from respiratory support in critically ill patients with COVID-19 by combining the results of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) with standard laboratory tests. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 31 consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and who required respiratory support between April 2021 and August 2021. We divided the patients into two groups according to the liberation from respiratory support and analyzed the differences between the groups. RESULTS: There were 20 patients in the liberation group and 11 in the non-liberation group. There were no significant differences in the overt disseminated intravascular coagulation scores or abnormal counts in the ROTEM parameters at admission between groups, although there was a significant difference in the highest score in the ICU. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and sepsis-induced coagulopathy scores were significantly different between both groups at admission and at the time when the highest values were reported during the ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: High sepsis-induced coagulopathy scores at admission to the ICU were found to be useful predictors of difficulties in the liberation from respiratory support in patients with severe COVID-19. However, increased overt disseminated intravascular coagulation scores and abnormal counts in the ROTEM parameters during the ICU stay were associated with difficulties in the liberation from respiratory support.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , COVID-19 , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation , Sepsis , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Retrospective Studies , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/complications , Intensive Care Units , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
Background: Hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) are infrequent but associated with a prognosis. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and blood tests performed at admission. Methods: In total, 31 patients with severe COVID-19 treated intensively at Saga University Hospital were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of hemorrhagic complications. Results from the blood tests performed at admission and during hospitalization, and ROTEM values acquired upon admission, were compared between the two groups. Results: There were significant differences in ROTEM values upon admission between the bleeding and non-bleeding groups. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) and extrinsically-activated test with tissue factor (EXTEM) amplitude at 10 min (A10) were 0.82 (0.52-0.92) and 0.81 (0.58-0.93), respectively. Logistic regression analysis with PT-INR and EXTEM A10 as factors calculated an odds ratio of 1.94 (1.04-3.62) and EXTEM A10 0.86 (0.71-1.05) for bleeding complications occurrence. Conclusion: ROTEM may be a sensitive predictor for bleeding complications in patients with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundHemorrhagic complications in patients with coronavirus 19 disease (COVID‐19) are infrequent but associated with a prognosis. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for bleeding complications in patients with COVID‐19 using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and blood tests performed at admission.MethodsIn total, 31 patients with severe COVID‐19 treated intensively at Saga University Hospital were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of hemorrhagic complications. Results from the blood tests performed at admission and during hospitalization, and ROTEM values acquired upon admission, were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were significant differences in ROTEM values upon admission between the bleeding and non‐bleeding groups. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT‐INR) and extrinsically‐activated test with tissue factor (EXTEM) amplitude at 10 min (A10) were 0.82 (0.52–0.92) and 0.81 (0.58–0.93), respectively. Logistic regression analysis with PT‐INR and EXTEM A10 as factors calculated an odds ratio of 1.94 (1.04–3.62) and EXTEM A10 0.86 (0.71–1.05) for bleeding complications occurrence.ConclusionROTEM may be a sensitive predictor for bleeding complications in patients with COVID‐19.
ABSTRACT
Rapid screening and diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 in the emergency department is important for controlling infections. When polymerase chain reaction tests cannot be rapidly performed, rapid antigen testing is often used, albeit with insufficient sensitivity. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of combining rapid antigen and antibody test results. This was a retrospective review of patients who visited our emergency department between February and May 2021 and underwent rapid antigen, immunoglobulin G antibody, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests. The study included 1,070 patients, of whom 56 (5.2%) tested positive on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of rapid antigen testing were 73.7%, 100.0%, and 0.87, respectively. The combined rapid antigen and antibody test result had improved diagnostic accuracy, with 91.2% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.95. The results of the rapid antigen and antibody tests could be combined as a reliable alternative to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.